🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure version of the president. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although he is called Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who studied his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. His harder version prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.