🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and revealed recent overtures had been made by mediators to resume discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if talks resume.

The US president last week said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly sought to enforce their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the primary answer to address disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."