🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where Black people are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.